21 CFR: What does it mean for hand and arm protection?

Sep 28, 2018 • TECH BLOG
Anthony Di Giovanni, Vice President of Global Marketing

The Food & Drug Administration (FDA) controls all the regulations related to items that are added to food (i.e. direct additives) and items that may come in contact with food (i.e. indirect additives). All gloves, apart from medical/exam type disposables are referenced in 21 CFR Parts 174 & 177 when used in food handling applications.

COMPONENTS OF A FOOD CONTACT ARTICLE

 

For our purposes, we only really need to concern ourselves with Parts 174 and 177. Before going further, it is  important to clearly state that 21-CFR does not call out items such as “gloves”. The regulations reference only the raw materials that make up the “Components of a Food Contact Article”. Clearly, gloves, or sleeves for that matter, are often used as food contact articles. Part 174 references these articles as Indirect Food Additives. They are defined more clearly as: “Items that come into contact with food as part of packaging, holding, or processing, but are not intended to be added directly to, become a component, or have a technical effect in or on the food.”

 

 

WHAT ABOUT PART 177?

 

Part 177 outlines the specifications related to the item classified as “Polymers”. What do gloves, or sleeves have to do with polymers? Simple, all the gloves and sleeves that PIP recommends for food contact are  synthetic and polymer-based — both the yarn and coating.

So, when we claim that a glove meets 21-CFR-177, it means that the raw material manufacturer of the yarn and, if coated, the resin manufacturer of the coating, meets the very detailed specifications outlined by FDA 21-CFR-177. Care to see an example? Click here to view the detailed specifications for nylon fiber used in many general-purpose gloves.

Ok, so we’ve established that the 21 CFR part 174 and part 177 are clearly about what is defined as “Indirect Food Additives” and the specifications of the raw materials used in producing gloves or sleeves that come in contact with food during the manufacturing or handling process.

 

HOW DOES THAT HELP US CHOOSE THE RIGHT GLOVE OR SLEEVE?

 

We consider that there are three types of food contact:


1. Direct contact substances are those that directly contact food.
2. Substances that might come in contact with food, such as on the outside of food bag or carton, are defined as indirect contact.
3. Incidental food contact are items that rarely contact food and the contact is not purposeful or continuous. For example, food that contacts an extraneous part of a food processing machine, where contact is not expected, is considered incidental.


It is important to consider the specific application when recommending alternatives. For example, while technically possible to use the G-Tek® 16-X570, which is classified as meeting 21-CFR-177, to debone meat, it is unlikely a butcher would opt for a black coated glove. A more common practice is to use an uncoated, high cut resistant glove and overlay or underlay with a disposable glove for maximum protection, impermeability, and hygiene.

GLOVE & SLEEVE GUIDE

 

Below is a guide to help you find the optimal 21-CFR glove or sleeve for the job:

Direct Contact in Food Processing for handling, mixing and preparing foods: Polymer Gloves

Direct Contact in Food Processing for butchering meats, de-boning fish or slicing vegetables (can be laundered and sanitized): High Cut Resistant Uncoated Knit Gloves

Direct Contact in Food Processing for butchering meats, de-boning fish or slicing vegetables (can be laundered and sanitized): High Cut Resistant Sleeves

Direct Contact in Food Processing and Food Service: Powder Free Disposable Gloves

Indirect Contact in Food Plants for MRO applications or sorting and boxing packaged food: Coat Seamless Knit General-Purpose Gloves

Indirect Contact in Food Plants – for MRO applications or sorting and boxing glass packaged food: Seamless Knit Cut Resistant Gloves

All 21-CFR Gloves

MORE ARTICLES

How D3O®iP™ Technology Is Setting A New Standard For Hand Protection

Impact-related hand injuries are the most common occupational hazards in the industrial work force. According to a study conducted by the U.S. Department of Labor between 2021-2022, 23 percent of all work-rel…

READ MORE

Enhancing Workplace Safety in the Construction Industry with Multi-Directional Head Protection Technology

It’s no surprise that workers in the construction industry are at a high risk of accidents; the industry consistently ranks as one of the most dangerous in the U.S. The causes of workplace injuries have…

READ MORE

Fentanyl in the Workplace: Addressing Occupational Risks and Leveraging the Right PPE

  As the opioid crisis continues to cast a long shadow over society, one potent synthetic drug has emerged as a critical player in this devastating epidemic: fentanyl. While its potency has rai…

READ MORE
pin Rep Finder
Compare ()
Clear All Compare
Okay, Got it.