Welding Garment Material Performance
Hand Protection
G-Tek® D3O® Impact Glove Series
UNRAVELING THE DYNAMICS OF ESD
Bouton® FogLess® 3Sixty™ Technology
Addressing AR/FR Pain Points
Specialized PPE for ELECTRIC VEHICLE MANUFACTURING
BioSoft™ Sustainable Bio-Based Ear Plugs
PIP® Field Installable 4-Point Hard Hat Chin Strap Demo
G-Tek® VRX™ ADVANCED PROTECTION
Bisley X-Airflow™ Workwear Shirts
6 Key Facts to Help Understand ARC FLASH RISKS
Head Protection
REUSABLE VS. DISPOSABLEUsing The Right Garment For The Right Job
Experience Barrier Protection and Flexibility With EXTENDED USE GLOVES
Bouton OpticalAdvanced Lens Technologies in Safety Eyewear™
What to Consider When Choosing HIGH VISIBILITY MULTI-SEASON WORKWEAR
What is Double Hearing Protection And When Would You Need It?
Mips®HELMET SAFETY SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY
4 HIDDEN JOBSITE RISKS And How To Avoid Them
SURVIVIVNG THE SUMMER HEAT A Guide to Workplace Safety and Hydration
MULTI-TASK WELDERS GLOVES Offer The Protection And Dexterity Welders Need
WELDING SAFETY SELECTOR GUIDE
HAND PROTECTION SELECTOR GUIDE
Protective Clothing
CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENT SELECTOR GUIDE
EYE PROTECTION SELECTOR GUIDE
INTERACTIVE CROSS REFERENCE
BioSoft™ THE WORLD'S FIRST SUSTAINABLE BIO-BASED EAR PLUGS
NOVAX ELECTRICAL SAFETYNot All Gloves Are Created Equal
Enhancing Workplace Safety in the Construction Industry with MULTI-DIRECTIONAL HEAD PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY
THORZT™ RAPID REHYDRATIONFor the Industrial Athlete
ON-SITE PPE ASSESSMENT
Hand Protection
Specialized PPE for ELECTRIC VEHICLE MANUFACTURING
INTERACTIVE CROSS REFERENCE
Addressing AR/FR Pain Points
Bouton® FogLess® 3Sixty™ Technology
UNRAVELING THE DYNAMICS OF ESD
G-Tek® D3O® Impact Glove Series
JSP Force Typhoon™ 8 Twin Filter Half Masks with PressToCheck™
PIP® Field Installable 4-Point Hard Hat Chin Strap Demo
BioSoft™ Sustainable Bio-Based Ear Plugs
PPE For Emergency Responders
ATA Fiber Technology Strength Meets Comfort
G-Tek® VRX™ ADVANCED PROTECTION
PPE For Emergency Responders
Heated Apparel For Cold Climates
INTERACTIVE CROSS REFERENCE
INTERACTIVE CROSS REFERENCE
Welding Garment Material Performance
Bisley X-Airflow™ Workwear Shirts
ON-SITE PPE ASSESSMENT
3 COMMON TYPES OF COLD STRESS And How You Can Prepare For Them
SUSTAINABLE SOLUTIONS IN PPE
PROTECTIVE SLEEVE BUYERS GUIDE
MULTI-TASK WELDERS GLOVES Offer The Protection And Dexterity Welders Need
ON-SITE PPE ASSESSMENT
SURVIVIVNG THE SUMMER HEAT A Guide to Workplace Safety and Hydration
HALF MASK RESPIRATORS REVOLUTIONARY FORCE TYPHOON™8
SUSTAINABLE SOLUTIONS IN PPE
4 HIDDEN JOBSITE RISKS And How To Avoid Them
Mips®HELMET SAFETY SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY
Bouton OpticalAdvanced Lens Technologies in Safety Eyewear™
What to Consider When Choosing HIGH VISIBILITY MULTI-SEASON WORKWEAR
6 Key Facts to Help Understand ARC FLASH RISKS
ON-SITE PPE ASSESSMENT
Head Protection
REUSABLE VS. DISPOSABLEUsing The Right Garment For The Right Job
Experience Barrier Protection and Flexibility With EXTENDED USE GLOVES
What is Double Hearing Protection And When Would You Need It?
CUSTOM LOGO SERVICES FAST, EASY & PRECISE
SUSTAINABLE SOLUTIONS IN PPE
WELDING SAFETY SELECTOR GUIDE
3SP ONLINE TRAINING
BisleyPREMIUM MULTI-SEASON WORKWEAR
Natural Disaster Relief PPE EXPECT THE UNEXPECTED
MADE-TO-ORDER SLEEVES Custom Options for Enhanced Performance
Enhancing Workplace Safety in the Construction Industry with MULTI-DIRECTIONAL HEAD PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY
ON-SITE PPE ASSESSMENT
THORZT™ RAPID REHYDRATIONFor the Industrial Athlete
Protective Clothing
BioSoft™ THE WORLD'S FIRST SUSTAINABLE BIO-BASED EAR PLUGS
NOVAX ELECTRICAL SAFETYNot All Gloves Are Created Equal
INTERACTIVE CROSS REFERENCE
CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENT SELECTOR GUIDE
3SP ONLINE TRAINING
3SP ONLINE TRAINING
EYE PROTECTION SELECTOR GUIDE
HAND PROTECTION SELECTOR GUIDE
When it comes to evaluating the protection levels of work gloves, two major industry standards are recognized worldwide: ANSI/ISEA 105-2016 and EN 388:2016.
The ANSI/ISEA 105-2016 standard, developed by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and the International Safety Equipment Association (ISEA), is the U.S. standard for hand protection. More broad in application, EN 388:2016 is the European standard used internationally. Both standards assess cut, abrasion, puncture, and tear resistance, but they are not directly comparable due to their different testing methodologies and classification systems.
Each standard utilizes a structured classification system and rigorous testing procedure to ensure that gloves meet specific safety and performance criteria. It is important to understand the classification systems for both standards, as many work gloves will show both marketing on the wrist or back of the hand. ANSI/ISEA 105-2016 provides numeric levels for resistance, while EN 388: 2016 incorporates both numerical ratings and letter grades, offering a comprehensive view of glove protection. By examining these standards, users can gain insights into their similarities and differences, helping to make informed decisions about the most suitable hand protection for various tasks and applications.
The ANSI/ISEA 105-2016 standard is a widely recognized benchmark for assessing the performance of protective work gloves in the United States. This standard focuses on providing clear and separate testing classifications for various types of resistance, ensuring that gloves meet specific safety and performance criteria for different industrial and occupational hazards.
Separate Markings: The standard has distinct markings for cut, abrasion, and puncture resistance, each tested separately
Classification Levels: Features nine cut levels and five abrasion and puncture levels
Identification: Each level is represented by a unique shield with the protection level indicated numerically, where the higher the number rating indicates the higher the level of protection
Exclusions: Has a separate standard for Impact Resistance (ANSI/ISEA 138-2019)
The EN 388:2016 standard is commonly used for evaluating the protective qualities of gloves, not only in Europe but also gloves sold in North America, Australia, and New Zealand. It offers comprehensive testing and rating for multiple types of mechanical hazards, providing users with reliable information about the gloves' performance in various protective categories.
Marking Presence: Commonly found on cut-resistant and non-cut-resistant gloves sold in North America.
Third-Party Testing: Gloves are tested by third party ISO labs for cut, abrasion, puncture, tear, and impact resistance.
Two Cut Ratings: Includes a Coup Test with five numerical levels and a TDM-100 Test (added in 2016) with letter grades A-F for more accurate cut resistance.
Impact Resistance: The impact test is optional and applies only to gloves claiming back-of-the-hand protection. Ratings are P (Pass), F (Fail), or X (not tested).
PIP® has been testing all gloves to both ANSI/ISEA 105-2016 and EN 388:2016 since 2005, offering several advantages to ensure comprehensive protection across various environments and workplace hazards:
Both ANSI/ISEA 105-2016 and EN 388:2016 use various methods to evaluate glove performance, though they differ in their approach.
Abrasion |
ANSI 105-2016 |
Taber Test |
The Taber Test involves securing the test fabric on a rotating disc while two wheels with a 180 grit abradant, such as emery board or sandpaper, rub the fabric in a circular motion. The number of cycles that the fabric can endure before its shows noticeable wear determines the abrasion rating on a 1-6 scale. This method is the most favored due to the wide range of materials it can evaluate. |
|
EN 388:2016 |
Martindale Test |
The Martindale Test uses a similar rotating disc to the Taber Test but rubs the fabric in a figure-eight motion. The number of cycles that the fabric can endure before it shows noticeable wear determines the abrasion rating. |
|
Cut |
ANSI/ISEA 105-2016 |
TDM-100 Test |
The sample is cut by a straight-edge blade, under a specific weight load that moves along a straight path. The sample is cut five times at three different weight loads, referred to as a cutting force, with a new size blade -- short, medium, and long -- for each load, providing 15 data-points. The cutting force is then used to determine the appropriate cut level. |
|
EN 388:2016 |
TDM-100 TestCoup Test |
The Coup Test is conducted using a circular blade that rotates in cycles and moves back and forth along the same piece of material until the material is cut through. The test uses the same amount of force on all samples. Materials that achieve a higher cut score will contribute to the dulling of the blade. |
|
Tear |
ANSI/ISEA 105-2016 |
Tear testing is not specifically called out under the ANSI/ISEA 105-2016 standard. |
EN 388:2016 |
Tear Resistance Test |
The EN388 Tear Resistance Test is measured by testing the tensile strength of a glove by applying force to four separate tear points on the fabric. The force is increased until the material is torn. The amount of force used to tear the material is recorded and categorized on a 1-4 scale. |
|
Puncture |
ANSI/ISEA 105-2016 |
Blunt Puncture Test |
The Blunt Force Puncture Testing uses a 4.5mm probe, resembling a ballpoint pen, at a 90-degree angle to simulate a tear or burst hazard. The test measures the amount of force needed for a blunt probe to pierce through PPE material at a rate of 100mm per minute. |
|
EN 388:2016 |
Blunt Puncture Test |
The Blunt Force Puncture Testing uses a 4.5mm probe, resembling a ballpoint pen, at a 90-degree angle to simulate a tear or burst hazard. The test measures the amount of force needed for a blunt probe to pierce through PPE material at a rate of 100mm per minute. |
|
Impact |
ANSI/ISEA 105-2016 |
Impact Resistance is testing under a separate standard: ANSI/ISEA 138-2019 |
EN 388:2016 |
Impact Resistance Test |
The sample is cut open and laid out flat over a raised anvil. A 2.5kg striker force is dropped on the knuckles at an impact force of 5 joules. If the average transmitted force is less than or equal to 7kN, the gloves will be marked P for Pass. If the average transmitted force is higher than 9kN, the gloves will be marked F for Fail. Gloves that have not been tested will be marked X. |
|
Selecting the right work gloves for your specific needs can make all the difference in ensuring safety and performance on the job. With the complexities of ANSI/ISEA 105-2016 and EN 388:2016, understanding these standards is crucial for making informed decisions.
Our team of hand protection experts are available to help you navigate these standards and find the best solutions for your safety requirements. Contact us for a personalized assessment and tailored recommendations to ensure you choose the perfect work gloves for your needs.
Revolutionizing Safety with GORE-TEX Pyrad® for Unmatched Arc-Rated PPE Comfort
Every second counts when working with electrical hazards; without the right gear, danger can strike in a flash. Despite national regulations designed to protect employees in these high-risk environments, …
READ MOREMake the Swap: Sustainable Hearing Protection that Doesn't Break the Bank
As the global shift toward sustainability gathers momentum, industries are seeking to integrate environmentally responsible practices at all levels of operation.1 One key area of focus is personal protective eq…
READ MOREAdvanced Head Protection Gear for Safer Construction Sites
Protecting workers from head injuries is a top priority in high-risk industries like construction, where head protection can be the difference between life and death. In the US alone, construction workers account…
READ MOREProposition 65 | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | Full Site
© 2012-2025 Protective Industrial Products, Inc. All rights reserved.
CALL US TODAY: (518) 861-0133
CUSTOMER SERVICE DIRECT: (855) 284-6800